Jul 26th, 2009 | No Comments

Attackers are exploiting one of the vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader that was patched earlier this week, a security researcher warned Friday as he urged users to update as soon as possible.

According to Bojan Zdrnja, an analyst at the SANS Institute’s Internet Storm Center (ISC), malicious PDF (Portable Document Format) files are circulating that infect systems by exploiting one of the eight bugs Adobe Systems Inc. patched Tuesday.

“This is not surprising, though, as a fully working [proof-of-concept] has been recently published,” said Zdrnja in an alert posted to the ISC site early Friday. “But it’s interesting to see that the attackers modified the proof-of-concept a little bit, probably in order to evade anti-virus detection.”

Shortly before Adobe patched the older Reader 8.1.2, Core Security Technologies, a security company that had reported the bug to Adobe in May, published sample attack code as part of its own advisory about the danger posed by rogue PDF files.

The malicious PDFs examined by Zdrnja contained a variation of the Core Security code. “Parts of the publicly-posted proof-of-concept are visible, but the attackers also modified certain parts,” he said. “This was probably enough to fool the [anti-virus] vendors.”

In fact, that was the result, Zdrnja argued. As of 11 a.m. EST, no anti-virus company had yet released a detection signature that could finger the malformed PDF files.

A second attack PDF, published to the milw0rm.com site on Wednesday, is slightly more visible to anti-virus vendors. The proof-of-concept PDF is currently identified by about 14% of anti-virus vendors, according to VirusTotal, a free scanning and reporting service.

“If you haven’t patched your Adobe Reader installations, do it ASAP as the attacks are in the wild,” Zdrnja urged.

The patches released Tuesday bring Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat up to version 8.1.3. Although that edition has been superseded by Reader and Acrobat 9, which debuted in June, most users continue to run older software long after updates or upgrades are available, according to statistics published earlier this year by Secunia ASP, a Danish vulnerability tracking company. Secunia offers a free utility called Personal Software Inspector (PSI) that scans Windows machines for unpatched and out-of-date software.

Users running Reader 9 or Acrobat 9 are safe from the current round of PDF attacks, according to Adobe.

Written by Ajay Matharu

July 26th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

Posted in Technology

Tagged with

Jul 24th, 2009 | 1 Comment

Search engines such as Google are increasingly being used by hackers against Web applications that hold sensitive data, according to a security expert.

Even with rising awareness about data security, it takes all of a few seconds to pluck Social Security numbers from Web sites using targeted search terms.

The fact that Social Security numbers are even on the Web is a human error; the information should never be published in the first place. But hackers are using Google in more sophisticated ways to automate attacks against Web sites.

Study recently discovered a way to execute a SQL injection attack that comes from an IP (Internet Protocol) address that belongs to Google.

In a SQL injection attack, a malicious instruction is entered on a Web-based form and answered by a Web application. It often can yield sensitive information from a backend database or be used to plant malicious code on the Web page.

Tools such as Goolag and Gooscan can execute broad searches across the Web for specific vulnerabilities and return lists of Web sites that have those problems.

Another attack method is so-called Google worms, which use the search engine to find specific vulnerabilities. With the inclusion of additional code, the vulnerability can be exploited.

Google and other search engines are taking steps to stop the abuse. For example, Google has stopped certain kinds of searches that could yield a trove of Social Security numbers in a single swoop. It also puts limits on the number of search requests sent per minute, which can slow down mass searches for vulnerable Web sites.

In reality, it just forces hackers to be a bit more patient. Putting limits on search also hurts security professionals who want to do automated daily searches of their Web sites for problems.

There is another kind of attack called “site masking,” which causes a legitimate Web site to simply disappear from search results.

Google’s search engine penalizes sites that have duplicate content and will drop one from its index. Hackers can take advantage of this by creating a Web site that has a link to a competitor’s Web page but is filtered through a proxy server.

Google indexes the content under the proxy’s domain. If this is done enough times with more proxy servers, Google will consider the targeted Web page a duplicate and drop it from its index.

One way Web site administrators can defend against this is barring their Web site from being indexed by anything other than the legitimate IP address of a search engine.

Written by Ajay Matharu

July 24th, 2009 at 9:34 am

Posted in Technology

Tagged with ,

Page 1 of 212